
Consumer advocates identity theft protection Utah condemn the practice as a whole, regardless of its profitability, because identity theft protection Utah it "takes advantage of consumers who are already hard-pressed to pay their debts".[10] According to the Dallas Morning News, in identity theft protection Utah 2008 the U.S.'s largest payday lender, Advance America, "made $4.2 billion in payday loans and charged $676 million in interest and fees." And "Cash America, a pawnshop operator and payday lender based in Fort Worth, recorded net income of $81 million last year – a 132 percent increase in identity theft protection Utah just four years – on total revenue of $1.03 billion."[11] Opponents of government regulation of payday loan businesses argue that some individuals that require the use of payday loans have already exhausted or ruined any other alternatives. how to get credit report Such consumers could potentially be forced to identity theft protection Utah turn to loan sharks or other illegal identity theft protection Utah sources if not for payday loans. Tom Lehman, an advocate of unfettered payday lending, said, Lehman attacked proponents of increased regulation of the lending industry, arguing that, Lehman has in turn been criticized for presenting himself as an independent voice while taking money from the payday loan industry.[13] A staff report released by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York concluded that payday loans should not be categorized as "predatory" since they may improve household welfare.[14] "Defining and Detecting Predatory Lending" reports "identity theft protection Utah if payday lenders raise household welfare by relaxing credit constraints, anti-predatory legislation may lower it." The author of the report, Donald P. credit score Morgan, defined predatory lending as "a welfare reducing provision of credit." However, he also noted that loans identity theft protection Utah are very expensive, identity theft protection Utah and that they are identity theft protection Utah likely to be made to under-educated households or households of uncertain income. Petru Stelian Stoianovici, a researcher identity theft protection Utah from The Brattle Group, and Michael T. Maloney, an economics professor from Clemson University, found "no empirical evidence that payday lending leads to more bankruptcy filings, which casts doubt on the debt trap argument against payday lending."[15] A 2010 study found that neighborhoods in which payday lenders were present or had a higher concentration of them, actually had lower rates of property crime[16]. free credit report all 3
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz